Exploring Social and Psychological Aspects of Conflict and Negotiation Leadership
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper examines the various social and psychological aspects of conflict and negotiation leadership. Drawing on a variety of theories and models, it examines the fundamental tension between cooperation and competition, as well as the benefits of cooperative orientations in fostering constructive communication, trust, and integrative solutions. The paper focusses the importance of understanding and addressing perceptions of justice and fairness, which are based on individual and cultural value systems, through transparent and inclusive procedures and equitable outcome distributions. The theoretical framework includes conflict resolution theories like competing theories, game theory, and cognitive theory, as well as negotiation theories like the structural approach and process analysis. The paper investigates how social justice perceptions, motivations, and needs, trust and distrust, communication and language, attribution processes, emotions, persuasion and self-control, power dynamics, violence, and judgemental biases impact conflict and negotiation dynamics. To overcome understanding barriers, the paper emphasises the importance of addressing underlying needs and motivations, managing intense emotions with emotional intelligence, and reducing cognitive biases. To be an effective conflict resolution leader, you must establish trust through consistent, transparent behaviour and a genuine commitment to mutual understanding and respect. The paper concludes by emphasising the significance of a thorough understanding of the intricate web of social and psychological forces at work when navigating the complex terrain of conflict resolution and negotiation leadership. It promotes cooperative mindsets, the pursuit of mutual benefit, and the recognition of shared interests in order to achieve long-term solutions that are consistent with the parties' core values and goals.
Keywords: Social, Psychological Aspects, Conflict, Negotiation, Leadership
Article Details
References
Ainsworth, S. H. (2020). Rational Choice Theory in Political Decision Making. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1019
Arjona, A. (2018). Civilian cooperation and non-cooperation with non-state armed groups: The centrality of obedience and resistance. In Rebels and Legitimacy (pp. 87-110). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429467271-5
Baker, J. H. (2020). Affairs of Party: The Political Culture of Northern Democrats in the Mid–Nineteenth Century. Fordham University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823295135
Barron, E. N. (2024). Game theory: an introduction. John Wiley & Sons.
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current directions in psychological science, 16(6), 351-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x
Bazerman, M. H. (2005). Negotiation, decision making and conflict management, Vol 1–3. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Blumberg, H., Kent, M. V., Hare, A. P., Davies, M. F., Blumberg, H., Kent, M. V., ... & Davies, M. F. (2012). Cooperation, competition, and conflict resolution. Small Group Research: Implications for Peace Psychology and Conflict Resolution, 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0025-7_1
Chimakati, F. M. (2023). Establishment Structural Dimension Design, Exigency Variables, And Challenges Mitigation in Kenya. African Journal of Emerging Issues, 5(9), 21-38.
Chimakati, F. M. (2024). Evaluating Corporate Governance Principles and Stakeholder Rights: A Case Study of Safaricom. African Journal of Emerging Issues, 6(1), 137-154.
Chimakati, F. M. (2024). Evaluation of Cross-Cultural Communication, Diversity and Building Harmony Leadership at Teachers Service Commission of Kenya. African Journal of Emerging Issues, 6(4), 103-116.
Cialdini, R. B., & Cialdini, R. B. (2001). The power of persuasion. Stanford Video. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0201-76
Coleman, P. T., Deutsch, M., & Marcus, E. C. (Eds.). (2014). The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons.
Cristofaro, M. (2020). “I feel and think, therefore I am”: An Affect-Cognitive Theory of management decisions. European Management Journal, 38(2), 344-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.09.003
Dandy, N., Fiorini, S., & Davies, A. L. (2014). Agenda-setting and power in collaborative natural resource management. Environmental Conservation, 41(4), 311-320.’ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892913000441
de Oliveira Dias, M. (2019). People, Process, and Substance: Current Definitions on Negotiation. People, 1(4).
Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. American Behavioral Scientist, 17(2), 248-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427301700206
Duckworth, A. L., & Steinberg, L. (2015). Unpacking self‐control. Child development perspectives, 9(1), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12107
Fisher, R., Ury, W. L., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin.
Folger, R. G., Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management (Vol. 7). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452225777
Ford, D. Y. (2013). Multicultural issues: Gifted underrepresentation and prejudice—Learning from Allport and Merton. Gifted Child Today, 36(1), 62-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217512465285
Foucault, M. (1980). Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews. Cornell University Press.
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098
Greenberg, J. (2011). Organizational justice: The dynamics of fairness in the workplace. https://doi.org/10.1037/12171-008
Hathaway, T. (2016). Lukes reloaded: an actor-centred three-dimensional power framework. Politics, 36(2), 118-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12099
Heukelom, F. (2007). Kahneman and Tversky and the origin of behavioral economics. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.956887
Inayaturrahmah, R., Barkah, C. S., & Novel, N. J. A. (2022). Analysis Thethe Role Ofof Negotiation Asas Communication Skills Inin Conflict Management. JBTI: Jurnal Bisnis: Teori dan Implementasi, 13(3), 217-227. https://doi.org/10.18196/jbti.v13i3.14888
Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (2008). Active learning: Cooperation in the classroom. The annual report of educational psychology in Japan, 47, 29-30. https://doi.org/10.5926/arepj1962.47.0_29
Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of management review, 23(3), 531-546. https://doi.org/10.2307/259293
Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 13(5), 505-521. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999399379168
Korobkin, R. (2024). Negotiation theory and strategy. Aspen Publishing.
Korostelina, K. (2014). Intergroup identity insults: A social identity theory perspective. Identity, 14(3), 214-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2014.921170
Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual review of psychology, 50(1), 569-598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569
Mann, M. (2012). The sources of social power: volume 1, a history of power from the beginning to AD 1760 (Vol. 1). Cambridge university press.
Meltzer, B., Petras, J., & Reynolds, L. (2020). Symbolic interactionism (RLE Social Theory): Genesis, varieties and criticism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003074311
Pincock, K., & Jones, N. (2020). Challenging power dynamics and eliciting marginalized adolescent voices through qualitative methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406920958895. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920958895
Pizer, S. (2021). Building bridges: The negotiation of paradox in psychoanalysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003221098
Rahim, M. A., & Katz, J. P. (2020). Forty years of conflict: the effects of gender and generation on conflict-management strategies. International Journal of Conflict Management, 31(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-03-2019-0045
Rawls, A. W. (1996). Durkheim's epistemology: the neglected argument. American Journal of sociology, 102(2), 430-482. https://doi.org/10.1086/230952
Samoilenko, S. A. (2018). Subversion practices: From coercion to attraction. Experiencing Public Relations: International voices Routledge, London, UK, 174-193. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315208251-14
Sherif, M. (2015). Group conflict and co-operation: Their social psychology. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717005
Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organization science, 4(3), 367-392. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.3.367
Tabassum, I. (2020). The importance of negotiation and conflict management. Journal of Management and Science, 10(2), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.26524/jms.2020.2.4
Thibaut, J. W. (2017). The social psychology of groups. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315135007
Thompson, L. (1990). Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological bulletin, 108(3), 515. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.515
Tjosvold, D. (2008). The conflict‐positive organization: It depends upon us. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 29(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.473
Tomlinson, E. C., Dineen, B. R., & Lewicki, R. J. (2004). The road to reconciliation: Antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile following a broken promise. Journal of management, 30(2), 165-187.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (2015). Causal schemas in judgments under uncertainty. In Progress in social psychology (pp. 49-72). Psychology Press.
Valitova, A., & Besson, D. (2021). Interpersonal communications at core of conflicts' escalation in organization. The interplay of interpersonal communication escalation, people's habitus and psycho-sociological processes are more important than contextual factors. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34(1), 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-04-2017-0131
West, G. B. (2010). Expert, coercive, legitimate, referent, and reward power bases as moderating variables upon the relationships between service, humility, and shared vision with affective organizational commitment and job satisfaction among members of the US Navy. Regent University.